The comment that stood out to me was this one, at the end:
"I don't think our guys are valuing practice the way they need to, and we've got to change that."
If that's the case, then allowing 90 and losing this game rather than if they had squeaked by with say an 86-85 win, might become the best thing that could have happened to them this season. I believe JAM and his staff will get the team right in practice and then we'll see if that carries over to the games. If so, then giving a game like this away late to a team like Sacred Heart, could serve as a much-needed wake up call to nip some things in the bud early, rather than allowing them to fester and become much longer lasting problems later on, when the season means much more.
Of course, that's the optimistic view. A more negative and pragmatic view might be that certain coaches and certain programs have certain identities and they don't often stray too much from that. Regardless of the players that come and go, Syracuse and Boeheim will always give you a tough time with their 2-3 zone. Michigan State may or may not be able to score easily some years, but Izzo's his teams will almost always defend and rebound, and play with grit, toughness and intensity. Some other programs will always run and shoot a bunch of 3s but not put much into defending or rebounding. Pecora's teams always had trouble scoring but would often stay in ugly, lower scoring games because of their defense and rebounding. For as long as JAM has been a head coach, be it at Niagara or Hofstra, his teams -- even though he always SAYS all the right things (and he did again tonight) about defense -- never had the reputations of being defense first, but rather, teams that could score well and would would simply try to outscore their opponents rather than putting the emphasis on stopping other teams from scoring. So to put up as many as 86 and still lose, isn't really surprising -- even against a team like Sacred Heart -- knowing JAM's history with his teams.
I'm hoping it's more the former scenario than the latter, and everyone, all of the coaches and players, make the necessary adjustments. But sometimes the identities of a coach and of a program are what they are and don't often change that much in college hoops.